Adopt an MP |
For an explanation of Early Day Motions click here.
Some MPs reply that they do not sign EDMs, but nevertheless indicate that they support our case - somewhat. For an example see replies from ministers Then read what to do next.
We are running a campaign which will make every UK MP more aware of our situation. It is a huge job and we want to enlist the help of all of you who are frustrated that things are not happening. You would be surprised the number of new MP’s who still do not know of our situation
Your Committees and Boards are limited in numbers so we direct our energies to correspondence with influential MP’s but they keep coming back to us with all the same old lame excuses.
Our new initiative is for each member to ‘Adopt an MP’ and correspond only with them, doing this will ensure that we reach every MP with the real facts. You do not need to be a member of a pensioner association to participate.
ARE YOU WILLING TO TAKE PART IN THIS CAMPAIGN?
If you need them, example letters are here on the website, which you can adapt to your own circumstances but please all mention the surplus in the National Insurance Fund and that pensioners in other parts of the world get the uplift..
You must also be prepared for negative replies and brush off’s, but still keep up the pressure. Also you should be prepared to commit at least 6 months to your contact with MPs. One email will not achieve much.
There is a new EDM 1895 which you need to read
Tracking Your MP
You can then click to the Theyworkforyou web site, and from there to the Hansard record if you wish. The Theyworkforyou web site gives you the opportunity to make a comment, in the hope that it will be passed on to the MP concerned.
Please share replies with us. Forward them to CONTACT BAPA especially if there is something in the reply that needs to be followed up.
Useful sources for reply:
If they say they can't do anything because you do not live in their constituency, tell them this is not a local matter but a national matter. Here is an excellent expansion of that thought composed by an adopter:
Two common statements by Ministers and lesser lights.
"Before entering into a new agreement, any Government would need to consider whether the advantages to be gained outweigh the cost of negotiating and administering the agreement."
Ask the writer how much would
it cost to negotiate and administer an agreement.
Don't elaborate on this question. Let them flounder.
Ask how much it would cost to
bring them up to the rate they would have if they lived in the Philippines.
Once again, do not elaborate on this question. You could use "USA" instead
of "the Philippines", but "the Philppines" might make them sit up and think.
Some MPs try to pretend that there is no National Insurance Fund
Is there a National Insurance Fund, or is it just "paper money"? See National Insurance Fund
Here are some sample messages:
Don't copy them slavishly. Write your own letter or email. Just use the ideas in these samples.
Dear someone MP
John Hutton,
when Pensions Minister, said: "The extension of the FAS is a big boost for
people who have lost their occupational pensions as a result of their
employer's insolvency. We have listened to the arguments of campaigners, and
we have complied with the order in the recent High Court judgment that we
reconsider the Ombudsman's recommendation that we compensate affected scheme
members.”
We frozen
expatriate pensioners who are denied annual uprating are delighted by the news
that the Government has managed to find the necessary funding – running into
billions – but we do wonder why the Chancellor cannot scrape together another
₤500 million (less than 1% of the pensions budget) in order to achieve parity
in the state pension, everyone receiving an amount strictly proportionate to
contributions made.
In the state
pension scheme, the Government as Administrator has a fiduciary responsibility
to treat contributors equally. Unlike those insolvent employers, the National
Insurance Fund has a huge surplus. Ours is not a monetary problem – just a
matter of simple morality.
Please help persuade them by signing EDM 1895.
Yours faithfully
Dear Whoever
As a WW2 veteran who has been deemed to be a member of the hero generation who
saved the country from a very inhospitable invasion, I am ashamed that the
country that I served cannot see fit to pay me the pension that I have paid for
on the grounds that I am now living in a country that has been excluded, in
quite an arbitrary and illogical fashion from receiving an indexed pension due
to the perceived cost, which cannot possibly be justified when the National
Insurance Fund surplus is currently £34 billion, rising to an estimated £74
billion by the year 2011/12.
It is a discriminatory, unfair and an immoral situation which any government
should be
ashamed to be part of, and I call upon you to end this blatant anomaly.
Dear Mr Boverintgon
I am a 75-year old British age pensioner. When I first found out that my pension
would be frozen because I live in Australia I accepted that as just the way it
was.
But then I found out that if I had retired to the Philippines or the USA my
pension would not be frozen. This made me angry. And I am still angry.
Please, Mr Boverington, why am I, living in an old loyal Commonwealth country,
treated like this, while pensioners just like me living in other countries get
full value for their compulsory contributions?
Have a look at
http://www.britishpensions.org.au/video.htm to see what I mean.
Yours faithfully,
Dear ------- MP
After a lifetime of working in the UK I came to - ------- to be with my
----------. It is a great shock to discover that the British State Pension
I receive here is not only frozen at the amount it was when I first arrived,
but that, after several enquiries, I am told that there is no intention of
ever indexing it and that no British government would, in any case, be able
to afford the £400 million or so every year to index our frozen state
pensions. You can imagine my surprise when I discovered that there are
billions (not millions) of pounds in the National Insurance kitty with which
any government could afford to put this horrific injustice to rights, should
it wish to do so. The will is just not there, although the means are
available.
However, this situation could be changed within the next few weeks as I find
that there ARE Members of Parliament who understand our plight and, with
determination, could remedy the situation for us. I am asking if you would
please be willing to join them (if you have not already done so) and put our
case firmly and strongly during the discussions on state pensions now taking
place in Parliament. There is a current EDM 1895 which gives the whole
picture and, if implemented, would remove this injustice that only some of
us are suffering. After all, our compatriot pensioners in the USA, Bermuda
and in many other countries who paid exactly the same National Insurance
contributions, already receive the indexing we request. Only a small
percentage
of extra expenditure is needed.
Please help by signing this EDM and putting our case for us.
Yours sincerely
Here are some more examples of Mps' replies
Dear Mr.
Thank you for your email. The fact that pensions are not uprated to
those outside the European Union is a well-known scandal. I am sorry
that you have been caught by this.
I prefer not to sign the Early Day Motion because my personal
preference would be to uprate pensions for those living within the
Commonwealth.
I am really very sorry that consecutive governments have failed to
deal with this matter.
Yours sincerely
Peter Viggers MP
NB Don't pick them up on the Commonwelth matter. If Commonwealth residents got parity the freezing regime would not last long.
Thank you for your email.
Mr Turner has asked me to take responsibility for ensuring that this matter is dealt with promptly and to your satisfaction. The office is open Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm, if you have any questions or concerns please do let me know.
Along with many of his colleagues of all parties Mr Turner is not in the habit of signing Early Day Motions. They are expensive to administer and are neither debated by the House of Commons nor receive any attention from the Government.
Mr Turner prefers to raise the issues directly with Ministers for two reasons, firstly, you then receive a full response to the matters you have raised and secondly Ministers are made aware of the levels of support or opposition to these issues. We will therefore ensure that the matters you raise within your email are addressed with the appropriate Department.
Obtaining information from others often takes some time, so please forgive me if I cannot always provide that reply as quickly as I would wish.
Kind Regards,
Vicky Hayward